We exported ChatGPT's citation list for "best AEO tools." There is no gatekeeper.
146 citations, 96 domains, 78 percent cited exactly once. Day one of a 90-day Airefs test, and a finding that changes the strategy.
Search for "best AEO tools" and nearly every result was written by a vendor ranking itself first. We buy our own subscriptions, point the tools at real sites, and publish the dashboards. Baselines, 90-day results, and verdicts you can check against the screenshots.
| Experiment | Test site | Starts | Day | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airefs, 90-day visibility test | visibilitybench.com (this site) | Jul 13, 2026 | 1 / 90 | Live |
| SE Ranking AI tracking, 90-day test | TBD | Q4 2026 | 0 / 90 | Planned |
| Otterly AI, 30-day trial evaluation | TBD | Q4 2026 | 0 / 30 | Planned |
Experiment 01 is running. Baseline captured July 13, 2026. Results published monthly whether the numbers move or not.
146 citations, 96 domains, 78 percent cited exactly once. Day one of a 90-day Airefs test, and a finding that changes the strategy.
We tried to build a pricing table for Airefs, SE Ranking, Otterly, AIclicks, and Promptwatch. The published sources contradict each other. Here is the evidence.
No tools, no signup. A repeatable manual check any owner can run this afternoon, plus what the free method cannot tell you.
No vendor accounts, no sponsored access. If a tool comps us anything, the article says so at the top.
Every test runs on an operating small business website. We describe test sites generically to protect the businesses, and blur identifying details in screenshots.
We capture the full dashboard before changing anything, then log every change we make so results can be traced to actions.
Every claim links to a screenshot or a logged data point. When a tool disappoints, we say so, including tools that pay us commissions.